Wednesday, February 22, 2012

What if's...

What if a corridor could cut through the site, creating a pathway between the Gateway School and the proposed community center?  What if fields for growing food or sports pitches were placed there?

What if the building could be gutted or cut into?  What if programs were allowed to spill out onto the street or into neighboring lots?  What if the roof spaces of existing buildings suddenly became inhabitable?


Tuesday, February 21, 2012

trace-paper tuesday


Rough dimensions of 2417 Cass



Section: pathways through the site


Perspective: community center

Monday, February 20, 2012

"maps on maps on maps"

Today I tried to address the project at a larger scale. 

As always, the questions come streaming in from all sides: how could the community center promote land "reclamation"?  Could churches in the area begin to add property to their holdings?  How could this happen?  What if the churches could be linked?  How does the Pruitt-Igoe site fit into this?   

Churches in the vicinity of the Pruitt-Igoe site; drawing connections.
Drawing pathways through the site that could link the churches; the sketch begins to show how vacant land might be appropriated by the congregations
Phases of land "reclamations" made by the churches

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

first steps, pt. 2


[a first pass at a direction for the project] :

Concept

The mapping began as an inquiry into urban renewal-era public housing projects in St. Louis; the high-rise versus low-rise debate became a central focus.  The map is a testament to the pervasive attitude against high-rise public housing, an attitude that arguably began with Pruitt-Igoe and was amplified by policies like Hope VI. 

The drawing provokes an architectural discussion of high-rise versus low-rise, but it also hints at a much broader issue: large-scale plans versus small-scale interventions.  This project asserts that large-scale projects—Pruitt-Igoe, the Northside Regeneration plan, and others—are ineffective and inhumane; that, quite simply, small is better than big.

Client

The project will serve the congregation of Grace Baptist Church, housed in what was, at the time of Pruitt-Igoe’s construction, a local grocery store.  After interviewing three church members (all former residents of Pruitt-Igoe), it has become apparent that there is a strong desire to restore basic amenities to the area.  At the same time, it is clear that these amenities must come in the form of a “community project” : a model entirely different from the large-scale strategies employed in the past and threatening to dictate the future.

Design Problem

Grace Baptist Church is currently raising funds for a community center on a neighboring property.  The congregation plans to retrofit an existing brick row-house on the site. 

The problem is twofold:  what does undertaking a “community project” entail, and what can the proposed community center be?  Likewise, the approach comes in two forms: a rigorous engagement with community members in an attempt to define a program and a focus on the potential of the center to reclaim those amenities—spatial, functional, emotional—that have been lost.   

first steps





Graphic to accompany "Pruitt-Igoe: Past, Present, Future"
24" x 36"


Community Project mapping
24" x 36" : mixed media



Wednesday, February 8, 2012

video premiere postgame

"Pruitt-Igoe : Past, Present, Future"
JD Scott and Ryan Wilson





Sketch of the Pruitt-Igoe power station, the only remaining building on the site.  The power station, now owned by Ameren, was designed by Hellmuth, Yamasaki, and Leinweber. 



View looking west on Dixon Street.



Site of the proposed Grace Baptist Church Community Center 

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

mapping revisions


revised mapping


sketch : looking west on Dixon [Pruitt-Igoe site]